Posts Tagged ‘Zenn’

Some hits and misses in a dangerous market

Sunday, January 24th, 2010
VOX / STOCK PICKS
Report on Business: Globe Investor Column
Some hits and misses in a dangerous market
FABRICE TAYLOR
804 words
13 August 2009
GLOB
B10
English
2009 CTVglobemedia Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Fabrice Taylor is a chartered financial analyst.

ftaylor@globeandmail.com

The Vox portfolio, if you can call it that, has performed quite well in the past few months. Our picks – and by “our” I mean myself and the countless anonymous people I lean on for ideas and advice – have done pretty well.

For performance reasons, we’re looking at the months from the beginning of October, 2008, the last time we did a scorecard, to the end of July, 2009.

We started getting bullish on stocks in general last October, and that wasn’t a bad idea. We stressed blue chips in early October, and they’ve done well since. They always lead in a recovery. Some of them tested or bested lows in March, and were cheaper then, but we don’t aim to pick the bottom. That’s impossible. We thought, and smarter people told us, that big stable companies were cheap on a historical basis and it appears they were.

Another theme that we embraced in October was infrastructure, based in part on stimulus spending but also valuation. In particular, we looked at Aecon Group, Genivar Income Fund and Churchill Corp. All have done very well. Churchill doubled, Aecon is up 63 per cent and Genivar did fine also, up 31 per cent (all figures assume reinvestment of dividends in the stock).

But not all blue chips did well. The jury is still out on Kraft. It’s flat, but Molson is up 8 per cent – not bad, but that’s in U.S. dollars.

A call on preferred shares wasn’t bad in early November. Falling interest rates and generally improving common equity prices have served them well, especially the preferred shares of big stable companies we recommended with the help of Desjardins Securities.

I thought the selloff in real estate was overdone last fall, and recommended Mainstreet Equity and Brookfield Properties. Mainstreet is up 18 per cent and Brookfield is flat.

Now for a couple of stinker calls, or at least apparent stinkers. I said stay clear of Bank of Montreal late last November because the yield was almost 10 per cent and the market is pretty efficient on big names. The stock is up so much I’m embarrassed to say (okay, it’s up 63 per cent). I also said Teck Resources was dangerous at $11 and it more than quadrupled.

It’s possible, though, that the market was pricing these properly. Yes, they provided good returns but at what was presumably a very big risk, particularly with Teck, whose risks were easy to understand. BMO, like any bank, is, in my opinion, impossible to understand. That said, I own bank stocks through an ETF and CIBC directly, and the latter did very well after I recommended it. Dumb luck at play somewhere.

“Buy oil” was a good call last December. Oil stocks are up a lot since then. Using Canadian Oil Sands Trust as a guide – the stock I chose – you’re up 34 per cent , and in my opinion it’s a long-term holding. I think it will get taken out by some international concern looking for safe reserves, of which Canadian has decades worth. I own the stock myself.

Avoiding Gildan was great advice – if you find extremely large gains repulsive. The stock is up more than 50 per cent. I still wouldn’t own it, but who cares. I was wrong.

Avoiding Yellow Pages Income Fund was better. The units are down, although with distributions the investment is up a little.

Osisko Mining was not a “sell”; it was a “buy” for anyone wanting to make a 47-per-cent gain. But I redeemed myself on Wesdome Gold Mines, up nearly 80 per cent. It’s buying back stock and paying dividends. When Osisko does that, I’ll be a fan.

Citigroup may have been “still sick” in March, when I said its earnings report was a crock. But if going up 100 per cent in price is sick, I’d like the bank to breathe in my face.

But I made up for that on a call to buy Ford stock in late April. So far it’s up 60 per cent. Who’d have thought that?

Staying with cars, shorting ZENN, the Canadian concern that hopes to make electric cars, didn’t pay, but it didn’t cost much. It’s still a short; there’s too much stronger competition and management’s vision isn’t clear enough.

All in all, the picks were not bad. The bold call today: Being long is probably better than being short over all. We’ll see if that’s smart in six months.

Document GLOB000020090813e58d0001a

Taking stock of Zenn’s ride

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
VOX: AUTOMOTIVE
Report on Business: Globe Investor Column
Taking stock of Zenn’s ride
FABRICE TAYLOR
848 words
29 April 2009
GLOB
B16
English
2009 CTVglobemedia Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Fabrice Taylor is a chartered financial analyst.

ftaylor@globeandmail.com

Zenn is a good name for a car company. It’s better than Feel Good Cars, which is what Zenn Motor Company ZNN used to go by. Zenn might stand for Zero Emissions No Noise, but it speaks to spiritual bliss and tranquillity.

But does it speak to high relative permittivity? Does it say “fill her up” with electricity and drive 400 kilometres on a five-minute charge? Does it signify a justifiable valuation of about $150-million on the back of no revenue and the usual chagrins of the startup?

Maybe, but I don’t see it. There’s zero doubt in my mind that Zenn has a chance to make lots of money. It’s just that the odds are – in my view – very, very small. The company’s stock is flying high because of some positive news releases and deft promotion. In the interests of balance, here’s the doubter’s companion: The most promising thing in the Zenn story is its investment and commercial agreements with a secretive little outfit in Texas called EEStor.

EEStor, founded by a couple of guys with a background in computer hard drive storage, is working on a way to store electricity. It hopes to produce something like a battery, although it doesn’t use chemical reactions to create electricity.

Zenn bought a 3.8-per-cent stake in EEStor a few years ago for $2.5-million (U.S.). It has an option to buy as much as 7 per cent more. It also signed an exclusive deal with EEStor that says only Zenn can use its so-called “capacitors” in small and mid-size cars.

Zenn has been helping financing EEStor by making payments based on certain milestones, the latest of which was met last week when EEStor said the material it hopes to use in its storage unit passed an important test regarding its relative permittivity – its ability to store energy.

That was good news, judging from the stock price, which is up 100 per cent in the past two weeks. But what does this news really tell us? Zenn says the results were better than it hoped for. But it says it has to evaluate exactly what it means and report back. So, we are vaguely aware that it’s good news, but not how good. Are investors getting ahead of themselves?

I spoke to chief executive officer Ian Clifford to get an idea. He’s a good promoter – and that’s not a disparaging comment since that’s a crucial skill when you’re raising money and selling a new concept – but he didn’t convince me that Zenn is going to deliver on its promise, not in a timely way.

Mr. Clifford says there’s no doubt in his mind that EEStor will succeed in bringing a disruptive or game-changing technology to market. But his reasons, at least those he shares (he might have to be tight-lipped about things) weren’t that persuasive.

He pointed out that EEStor has a deal with Lockheed Martin. But Ballard Power had lots of deals with big car makers. These firms spend billions on research and development, and they dole it out to lots of companies. No established car maker appears to have agreements with EEStor. Mr. Clifford did add that Lockheed has been issued two patents that mention EEStor, which may mean something. Or not.

The most attractive feature of a capacitor as opposed to a battery is that it can recharge quickly. Who, after all, will buy a car that takes hours or even an hour to fuel up?

Mr. Clifford said that capacitors are known for charging quickly. Their weakness, which EEStor is trying to fix, is they don’t store much power. But when pressed as to whether EEStor’s high capacity storage, should it see the light of day, will also charge fast, he said that a capacitor is a capacitor, “that’s all I can say.”

Most puzzling was that Mr. Clifford didn’t want to discuss how close EEStor was getting to commercial viability, saying it’s not Zenn’s job to predict.

Really? But Zenn told investors it will introduce a car with EEStor technology by the end of this year. Surely management must have some inkling as to when these “batteries” will be ready. The company is standing by that prediction, incidentally, but it looks impossibly far-fetched given what we know from EEStor.

Buying Zenn stock means betting on EEStor, plain and simple. There are billions of dollars competing with them. I hope Zenn pays off, but the story reminds me of Timminco: a promising sounding technology in a sexy sector, well promoted but short of concrete evidence of viability. If you bought it three years ago, you’re still up nicely. But if you bought during bouts of promotion and held on, you’re still toast.

Illustration

Document GLOB000020090429e54t0005n