Archive for October, 2010

30-second GM analysis: Government’s loss is your gain

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

GM is going public next month in New York and Toronto. Government spinoffs usually do well (think CN and Petro-Canada). This one will do especially well. The U.S. Treasury Dept. has about $40 billion invested in GM equity, which on the balance sheet is worth $24 billion. The government’s 60% stake is therefore worth about $15 billion.

There is no way the taxpayer will see a return on this investment in the short or even medium term. Even if GM trades at twice book value, the government’s return is negative at first and for a while, and it won’t trade at twice book.

So what’s the government to do? Price it cheaply and flog it to as many retail investors (a.k.a. voters) as possible. After all, if they make money, they won’t mind if the government loses.

GM has been encouraging employees, retirees and dealers to buy stock. And the stock will apparently be split to price each share in the $20-$25 range, according to the Wall Street Journal. They’re aiming squarely at the little guy and they won’t let him lose.

Read this for a little more detail.

The most bias news you’ll ever hear

Monday, October 25th, 2010

Almost all the positive news you get about the housing market comes from people who benefit if you buy or sell: realtors and mortgage lenders like banks. Take their views with an enormous grain of salt.

The Economist magazine, in its annual real estate issue, says Canadian housing is overpriced by more than 20%. I doubt the magazine is biased one way or another.

If you want to know whether a market is frothy look at how much it’s gone up compared to the long-term average. Housing in Canada is up more than 7% a year for the past decade. Obviously it can’t go up much more than inflation or no one would be able to afford a house eventually. Inflation averages about 3%.

This is a terrible time to buy a house and especially a condo. A 10-year bubble doesn’t deflate overnight.

Buyers are only just starting to realize that it’s a buyer’s market. Sellers haven’t figured it out yet. Once they do, and they start tripping over each other to sell before it’s too late, just as buyers did the opposite for three years, house pricing will be rational again.

More on buying a dollar for 80 cents

Sunday, October 24th, 2010

My column on the DPF India fund prompted a lot of mail that I thought best to answer here. First, yes, there are substantial fees involved including a hedge-fund-like bonus structure. I should have pointed this out in my column. I didn’t because in my view the fees are worthwhile since it’s very difficult to buy Indian stocks as the market is regulated. Cost of doing business.

Second, some saw an inconsistency between that column and another on the IPO of a Middlefield closed-end fund. But that’s not right. I advise avoiding these things on the initial public offering because you literally can’t win. Buying them at a discount when there are no warrants outstanding can be a good idea if you think the conditions I outlined in the DPF column exist – rising NAV and narrowing discount.

I think the manager of the fund, Goodman, which is part of the Dundee family, wants to close the discount because they want to issue new units. I don’t think they’ll do that at a discount. I would certainly think that would be worth a column if they did and it wouldn’t be a favourable one obviously.